The arrival of ChatGPT in the classroom, initially denounced as a threat for its use by students in summaries and assignments, has now become a common resource for teachers, generating an unsettling sense of ethical incoherence. The dilemma is not merely economic—why pay substantial tuition fees for what the algorithm offers freely—but existential. Does this not erode trust in the educational relationship and the promise of transmitting human experience? The tension between tradition and technology places the very authenticity of pedagogy in question.

Teachers, for their part, regard AI as a tool that amplifies their capacity and allows them to focus on what matters most. Yet their true challenge does not lie in producing materials more quickly. It lies in preserving what no technology can replicate: the dimension of care, attentive listening, and empathy. Teaching involves accompanying vital processes as well as transmitting knowledge. When AI is integrated without this awareness, education risks becoming a technical procedure emptied of presence, stripped of the very life that gives it meaning.