Meta had contractors pose as minors to test how rival chatbots handled some of the most dangerous subjects a child might bring to a screen. According to WIRED, workers on a project managed by Covalen created dummy under-18 accounts and sent prompts to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Character.AI about suicide, eating disorders, sex, drugs, and other high-risk material. One testing round in 2025 produced tens of thousands of prompts. Meta defended the work as routine safety benchmarking and said it does not use competitor benchmarking to train its own models. The companies being tested said they had not authorized the project.

The detail that stays with the story is the borrowed child. An adult worker writes panic, shame, danger, curiosity, and bad advice into a rival system while a spreadsheet waits for the answer. The exercise may produce useful evidence about refusal rules, but it also turns adolescent distress into a competitive instrument. Safety work needs ugly examples, because real harm often arrives in ugly language. The trouble begins when the child in crisis becomes a role performed at scale by contractors, inside dummy accounts, for a company trying to measure competitors without being seen. The teenager is absent, but the job still requires someone to manufacture the sentence a frightened teenager might type alone.