The volunteer in the art world is a vanishing breed thanks to the institutions they serve. The Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) had 3000 volunteers when Michael Govan became director in 2006. Today it is questionable whether the museum volunteer will continue to exist at LACMA at all.

Prior to Govan’s arrival, the volunteers were among the most staunch supporters of the museum. They gave freely thousands of hours of time and expertise not to mention money to a county institution that operates without an endowment. The volunteers belonged to fifteen different councils. The docent, museum service and art museum councils interacted directly with the public. The remaining councils were support groups for the various departments of Los Angeles’s only encyclopedic art museum. The support councils had a unique position in the ecosystem of the museum. They created and funded many public programs and cultivated future collectors and donors for the museum. They also supported exhibitions and provided funding for acquisitions since the departments receive no funds from the museum for purchase of new art. Certainly the councils enriched the museum.

However this was not the opinion of the administration. Early in Govan’s tenure, in an address to the Council chairmen, LACMA’s CFO said that the councils were a financial drain on the museum- that they did not bring in enough money to justify the use of museum facilities. The minimum council membership fees were raised to $400 per couple per annum. Almost immediately half of the 3000 volunteers disappeared off the roles. Gone were the interested students and knowledgeable academicians. It was clear that money was more important than educational programming. The remaining volunteers were left feeling disgruntled and unappreciated but were not ready to give up their councils.

The final blow was dealt in the fall of 2012 when the administration announced unilaterally that minimum council fees would be $1000 per annum and that a patron level membership ($250) was required for council membership. Effective July 1, 2013 council planning boards were dissolved. With the increased fees the ranks of supporters will shrink even further and there will be little funding for programing or acquisitions. Such steps make it abundantly clear that volunteer participation is not wanted but that volunteer money is most welcome.

In addition the public service councils like the docents are feeling unsettled as the talk of replacing the main campus escalates. If sections of the museum are closed for extended periods of time then the docents will have no work. As a result forty docents have already transferred to the J. Paul Getty Museum in Brentwood.

The administration’s justification for their action is that councils were elitist. They now choose to address a younger and more ethnically diverse demographic in an effort to cultivate a new support base for the museum. This marketing strategy seems short sighted. Why alienate your traditional supporters? Why curb the free programming that the councils provided for the public? Why further isolate your curators from the public by taking away their support councils? The answer, of course is MONEY. With some twist of logic the administration hopes that a newer, younger, more diverse audience will provide them with more funds. Let’s hope it’s true as they steamroll over the good will of former volunteers, the ones who once were their biggest supporters.

Kay Talwar holds an M.A. in Art History from the University of Michigan. She has co-authored Indian Pigment Paintings on Cloth for the Calico Museum of Textiles, Ahmedabad and In Adoration of Krishna for the Tapi Collection, Surat. In Los Angeles she has been involved for many years in promoting Indian art and cultural activities. She served as Chairman of the Southern Asian Art Council at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art for six years and is a Bharata Natyam dancer.